<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Talkwards &#187; microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.talkwards.com/tag/microsoft/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.talkwards.com</link>
	<description>Advancing Talkwards...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 16:33:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Random thought: Windows disproves Darwinism</title>
		<link>http://www.talkwards.com/2009/02/random-thought-windows-disproves-darwinism</link>
		<comments>http://www.talkwards.com/2009/02/random-thought-windows-disproves-darwinism#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 11:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hoakz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers and Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarcasm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.talkwards.com/?p=495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft Windows is the unique case that disproves Darwin&#8217;s theories of natural evolution and survival of the fittest while at the same time supplying no support for the main theory opposing Darwinism, the so called Intelligent Design Theory.  It is obvious the existence of a system such as Microsoft Windows is the work of a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft Windows is the unique case that disproves Darwin&#8217;s theories of natural evolution and survival of the fittest while at the same time supplying no support for the main theory opposing Darwinism, the so called Intelligent Design Theory.  It is obvious the existence of a system such as Microsoft Windows is the work of a deity.  In this case an inherently chaotic and evil one; we usually refer to it as the Devil.</p>
<p>Mmm&#8230; wonder if I may be able to do a thesis on that, just wonder if it should be in the religion or computer science department&#8230; <img src='http://www.talkwards.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.talkwards.com%2F2009%2F02%2Frandom-thought-windows-disproves-darwinism&amp;title=Random%20thought%3A%20Windows%20disproves%20Darwinism" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://www.talkwards.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.talkwards.com/2009/02/random-thought-windows-disproves-darwinism/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Office 2007: Microsoft shoots itself in the foot?</title>
		<link>http://www.talkwards.com/2008/03/office-2007-microsoft-shoots-itself-in-the-foot</link>
		<comments>http://www.talkwards.com/2008/03/office-2007-microsoft-shoots-itself-in-the-foot#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hoakz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer Applications and Programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[configuration management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[docx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office 2003]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenOffice.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hoakz.com/blog/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Upgrading from Office 2003 to 2007 might become a real problem, especially if you only do it for some people in your organization or if you send Office documents to people outside of your organization.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the somewhat dubious pleasure of working at a place where the migration from Office 2003 to 2007 is halfway done.  Now, usually this should be no problem, but a couple of factors have cooperated to make it one.</p>
<p>Office 2007 uses a new (and improved?) format (they added an x to all their file name extensions, <a title="New default XML formats in the next version of Office" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2005/06/01/424085.aspx" target="_blank">read more about them here</a>).  This could be all good and well if it had not been for the fact that new versions of Office now uses these formats per default.  Okay, a user a bit savvy might sooner or later notice the &#8220;x&#8221; at the end of all filenames&#8230; but only the users that have disabled the setting in Windows to hide these formats&#8230;</p>
<p>This leaves us with senders, running Office 2007, unable to tell if they saved the file in docx or doc format, and the recipients with Office 2003, unable to read these files.  Even though there is an <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=941b3470-3ae9-4aee-8f43-c6bb74cd1466&amp;displaylang=en" target="_blank">update</a>, a lot of users aren&#8217;t comfortable with doing that&#8230; heck, I&#8217;m scared of doing unneccessary stuff to my wobbly M$ installation!</p>
<p>The end result becomes pretty predictable: chaos, disillusioned users, and &#8230; a great day to start talking about <a title="OpenOffice.org" href="http://www.openoffice.org/">OpenOffice.org</a>? (even though <a title="Future compatibility with .docx, .xlsx etc?" href="http://www.oooforum.org/forum/viewtopic.phtml?t=27369">it does not yet support the Office 2007 format</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.talkwards.com/2008/03/office-2007-microsoft-shoots-itself-in-the-foot/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

